Skip to main content

Leapfrog - great games and toys for kids

This stock has suffered a slowdown in growth. Should be a good entry as the Xmas season approaches. Guidance flat to slightly higher.



Leapfrog beats by $0.03, guides Y04 in line (LF) 18.55 -0.23: Reports Q2 (Jun) net loss of $0.12 per share, $0.03 better than the Reuters Estimates consensus of ($0.15); revenues rose 18.8% year/year to $80.8 mln vs the $75.2 mln consensus. Company issues in-line guidance for Y04 (Dec), sees EPS of $1.18-1.28, vs. Reuters Estimates consensus of $1.19, and revenues of $770-800 mln, vs consensus of $779.7 mln.



Need to add chart analysis.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tracking Short List 2/10/09

With thoughts of a prolonged recession and increased savings rate from consumers, it means upscale spending should continue to be down even as the economy improves. This should affect Saks (SKS) and Tiffany's (TIF) and WFMI and Nordstrom's. It is also reported that casino business was down in December. That should affect LVS, MGM, WYNN, BYD. I haven't had a chance to review these stocks or add more. Just noting it with plan to review soon for action.
Post a Comment
Read more

Ahead with Index Funds

http://www.gregkarp.com/blog/2009/04/22/indexes-trump-managers%e2%80%a6again/ Adding to the pile of evidence that you can’t beat the market was a Standard & Poor’s study released this week. It found that over the five-year period from 2004 to 2008, the S&P 500, a popular index for big-company stocks, beat 71.9 percent of actively managed funds, those who employ a stock-picker. That’s especially striking, considering those high-paid stock-pickers are supposed to be able to trounce the general market during a recession. Among funds that held medium-sized company stocks, 75.9 percent lost to the index. (S&P MidCap 400). The story is even more profound among small-company stocks. The index, S&P SmallCap 600, outperformed 85.5 percent of funds that concentrate on small companies. Results were similar for the five-year period from 1999 to 2003, Standard & Poor’s said. Same story with funds that hold stocks of international companies. “But,” you might think, “I’ll just cho...
Post a Comment
Read more